[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GTK patches part 2
From: |
Eric Gillespie |
Subject: |
Re: GTK patches part 2 |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Dec 2002 15:04:30 -0500 |
User-agent: |
nmh/1.0.4+dev (i386-unknown-netbsdelf1.6) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> config.h does indeed include stdlib.h, so I think the question is, how
> did it happen that stdlib.h failed to get included when you tried
> this? That could be a bug, but it would be a bug in a different
> place.
As i think i said in another post, my suggesting stdlib.h was
over-zealousness on my part. The missing stdio.h was real (got
an error about stderr reference) and noticed malloc usage while
i was there. Bad assumptions lead to bad advice.
In another post, Jan reveals why the stdio.h problem was not
obvious until i tried to build: s/gnu-linux.h includes stdio.h.
This sort of thing is bound to happen again in the future, which
is why i suggest that it is better to include the headers you
need, rather than relying on system-dependent header files to do
it for you.
--
Eric Gillespie <*> address@hidden
Build a fire for a man, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on
fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. -Terry Pratchett
- GTK patches part 2, Jan D., 2002/12/08
- GTK patches part 2, Jan D., 2002/12/08
- Re: GTK patches part 2, Eric Gillespie, 2002/12/09
- Re: GTK patches part 2, Jan D., 2002/12/10
- Re: GTK patches part 2, Eric Gillespie, 2002/12/10
- Re: GTK patches part 2, Jan D., 2002/12/10
- Re: GTK patches part 2, Eric Gillespie, 2002/12/10
- Re: GTK patches part 2, Jan D., 2002/12/10
- Re: GTK patches part 2, Eric Gillespie, 2002/12/10
- Re: GTK patches part 2, Richard Stallman, 2002/12/11
- Re: GTK patches part 2,
Eric Gillespie <=
- Re: GTK patches part 2, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/12/12
- Re: GTK patches part 2, Jan D., 2002/12/11
- Re: GTK patches part 2, Richard Stallman, 2002/12/11