[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: TODO additions
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: TODO additions |
Date: |
Fri, 01 Nov 2002 22:32:22 -0500 |
I think that a browser should be able to render such stuff regardless.
In some cases pages are actually unusable without the background
because of what losing `designers' have put on top.
Many pages are unusable without Internet Explorer, or unusable without
Flash--by comparison, would these be significant in number?
I don't have personal experience with either kind of page, so I can't
say whether supporting background images "correctly" does more harm or
more good. What I can say is that people should not blindly assume
that supporting them "correctly" is the right choice. Maybe it is,
and maybe not.
But maybe the issue is not a real one. If "correct" implementation of
background images is not a possible, then why worry about the issue?
PPM does colour and is supported generally, so it may be able to
replace both PBM and XPM.
If this works, I agree it is a good idea. So it's just a matter of
verifying that this really works.
- Re: TODO additions, (continued)
- Re: TODO additions, Richard Stallman, 2002/11/29
- Re: TODO additions, Francesco Potorti`, 2002/11/29
- Re: TODO additions, Richard Stallman, 2002/11/30
- Re: TODO additions, Richard Stallman, 2002/11/06
- Re: TODO additions, Dave Love, 2002/11/11
- Re: TODO additions, Richard Stallman, 2002/11/13
- Re: TODO additions, Dave Love, 2002/11/17
Re: TODO additions,
Richard Stallman <=
Re: TODO additions, Dave Love, 2002/11/05