[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: please consider emacs-unicode for pervasive changes
From: |
Dave Love |
Subject: |
Re: please consider emacs-unicode for pervasive changes |
Date: |
06 Sep 2002 00:59:12 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> RMS complained about even chaneglogs getting changed,
>
> I recall these changes but not what caused them. Were they caused by
> the emacs-unicode branch?
Yes, in the case you complained to me about (on the branch, and it was
actually edits of handa's did originally). However, I seem to
remember there were other problems, probably due to people using
unification-on-decode, contrary to the warnings.
> If so, what exactly was the nature of the change that occurred? Was
> the change a matter of replacing one correct iso-2022 representation
> with a different but equally correct representation for the same
> characters?
Yes, since it was Latin-1 v. Latin-2 if I remember correctly. If it
had been Chinese v. Japanese, it might not have been correct.
> but it will
> certainly screw various Emacs 21 lisp/{international,language} files.
>
> As part of convertng Emacs to use unicode for most characters,
> won't we also change these files to use unicode?
They mostly haven't been touched, and don't need to be. You can't
generally change them to Unicode (as opposed to utf-8-emacs) because
they may contain non-Unicode characters. Also, if you want, say, to
maintain the distinction between Japanese and Chinese in HELLO, you
don't want to unify that.
> So they won't be clobbered.
If anyone else starts working on that code, they better understand the
issues anyhow...
> Editing the non-unicode Emacs 21 files might change them, indeed.
(Those and similar files.) That's just what I'm warning about.
> Is this an inevitable consequence of the unification done by
> Unicode?
No. The fact that you can't prevent it for i/o of general iso-2022 is
a missing feature, as handa said. (Not that I know the design for
that.) I thought it was a design feature you insisted on that the
character space is much bigger than Unicode for that sort of reason.
Re: please consider emacs-unicode for pervasive changes, Dave Love, 2002/09/04
- Re: please consider emacs-unicode for pervasive changes, Richard Stallman, 2002/09/05
- Re: please consider emacs-unicode for pervasive changes, Kai Großjohann, 2002/09/05
- Re: please consider emacs-unicode for pervasive changes,
Dave Love <=
- Re: please consider emacs-unicode for pervasive changes, Richard Stallman, 2002/09/06
- Re: please consider emacs-unicode for pervasive changes, Dave Love, 2002/09/07
- Re: please consider emacs-unicode for pervasive changes, Richard Stallman, 2002/09/08
- Re: please consider emacs-unicode for pervasive changes, Kenichi Handa, 2002/09/08
- Re: please consider emacs-unicode for pervasive changes, Richard Stallman, 2002/09/09
- Re: please consider emacs-unicode for pervasive changes, Dave Love, 2002/09/12
- Re: please consider emacs-unicode for pervasive changes, Richard Stallman, 2002/09/13
- Re: please consider emacs-unicode for pervasive changes, Dave Love, 2002/09/25
- Re: please consider emacs-unicode for pervasive changes, Richard Stallman, 2002/09/27