[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile |
Date: |
Sun, 4 Aug 2002 17:25:55 -0600 (MDT) |
> We should extend Guile so that its mechanism for handling variables
> dynamically is up to the job; then we should use that mechanism for
> these variables.
yeah - let's extend Guile to be a kind of Common Lisp.
I am talking about a small change in features that already exist. The
issue at hand is for features Common Lisp does not have.
A lot of _really_ smart people contributed to the design of Common Lisp.
It is a shame that you want to throw away all that good work and
redesign everything from scratch.
You mean smart people like Guy Steele, who is also co-designer of Scheme?
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, (continued)
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Kai Großjohann, 2002/08/03
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Simon Josefsson, 2002/08/03
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Sam Steingold, 2002/08/03
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/08/04
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Richard Stallman, 2002/08/04
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Sam Steingold, 2002/08/05
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Alex Schroeder, 2002/08/09
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Richard Stallman, 2002/08/10
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Sam Steingold, 2002/08/05
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Noah Friedman, 2002/08/10
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Alex Schroeder, 2002/08/10
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Sam Steingold, 2002/08/11
Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Richard Stallman, 2002/08/02