[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: kill ring menu
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: kill ring menu |
Date: |
06 May 2002 15:39:39 +0900 |
Colin Walters <address@hidden> writes:
> I assert (without any statistics) that the vast majority of users put
> (global-font-lock-mode 1) in their ~/.emacs file (thereby loading
> font-lock.el), and expect fontification in every mode, while the
> remaining portion don't want any fontification at all.
I think there needs to be a bit more evidence to justify changing the
status quo.
For my part, I've never seen any complaints on any of the emacs
lists/newsgroups from people that dislike fontification in non-font-lock
modes (this is the important case, because most package currently seem
to either use font-lock, or if not, to default to always having
fontification).
I think it is true that using font-lock is wasteful if all it does is
examine text-properties which could have just as easily been face
properties.
-Miles
--
P.S. All information contained in the above letter is false,
for reasons of military security.
- Re: kill ring menu, (continued)
- Re: kill ring menu, Richard Stallman, 2002/05/05
- Re: kill ring menu, Colin Walters, 2002/05/06
- Re: kill ring menu,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: kill ring menu, Colin Walters, 2002/05/06
- Re: kill ring menu, Miles Bader, 2002/05/06
- Re: kill ring menu, Colin Walters, 2002/05/07
- Re: kill ring menu, Miles Bader, 2002/05/07
- Re: kill ring menu, Richard Stallman, 2002/05/07
- Re: kill ring menu, Colin Walters, 2002/05/07
- Re: kill ring menu, Miles Bader, 2002/05/07
- Re: kill ring menu, Colin Walters, 2002/05/08
- Re: kill ring menu, Miles Bader, 2002/05/08
- Re: kill ring menu, Colin Walters, 2002/05/08