[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: featurep
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: featurep |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Mar 2002 19:35:15 -0700 (MST) |
I didn't include all the standard features, so while
(featurep 'make-network-process '(:family local))
returns t iff local sockets are supported, testing with
(featurep 'make-network-process '(:family nil))
returns nil, because the default is always supported, so there
is no reason to (be able to) test for it. Is that ok?
That seems reasonable.
BTW, I've changed Ffeaturep to use Fmember instead of Fmemq to compare
features, so we can now use all sorts of data (e.g. lists or strings)
as subfeatures.
Yes, that was essential here.
Re: featurep, Kim F. Storm, 2002/03/19
Re: featurep, Richard Stallman, 2002/03/21
- Re: featurep, Kim F. Storm, 2002/03/21
- Re: featurep,
Richard Stallman <=
Re: featurep, Stefan Monnier, 2002/03/21
Re: featurep, Kim F. Storm, 2002/03/21
Re: featurep, Stefan Monnier, 2002/03/21
Re: featurep, Kim F. Storm, 2002/03/22