[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Feb 2002 12:37:45 +0100 |
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002 11:27:48 +0100, Andreas Schwab <address@hidden> wrote:
> Buffer names can be quite large, the one I'm currently typing in is named
> "*wide reply to Juanma Barranquero*".
Well, yes, of course. But I'd like to know how many times you've used
IELM against such kind of buffer...
Perhaps my experience is more limited, but I use IELM quite a lot, and
to me its usage pattern is mainly twofold: as a quick way to test some
elisp code (where it is more responsive/practical that a lot of M-: or
M-x eval-expression), and as an aid in developing elisp modules (and
then usually the .el buffer or a few temporary test buffers are the
target).
Anyway, I just proposed that because I find it useful. If I'm the only
one, I can always do
(add-hook 'ielm-mode-hook
'(lambda ()
(setq mode-line-process
'(":" (:eval (buffer-name ielm-working-buffer))))))
on my .emacs :)
/L/e/k/t/u
- ielm working buffer on the modeline, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/02/27
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/27
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/02/28
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Andreas Schwab, 2002/02/28
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Kim F. Storm, 2002/02/28
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/02/28
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Kim F. Storm, 2002/02/28
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Stefan Monnier, 2002/02/28
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/28
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Stefan Monnier, 2002/02/28