[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Feb 2002 13:15:23 -0700 (MST) |
I am sure "we" as in the GNUTLS developer can do it. Should I forward
this request to them?
Please do.
However, I'm not sure this would be
useful for Emacs though, because using it would only move us to the
same level as we have with the current OpenSSL support.
It would certainly be useful for Emacs to be able to use GNUTLS in the
same way it can use OpenSSL. Much better than being *unable* to use
GNUTLS in the same way.
That is what prompted me to write the GNUTLS bindings
for Emacs.
Technically, installing those changes is a good idea. (However, it
would still be a good feature if Emacs can use GNUTLS even if it was
not compiled to use GNUTLS.)
Given the authoritarian climate, and the restrictions now being
proposed in the UK, I think it is desirable to keep crypto code
to the smallest possible number of packages.
- Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings, (continued)
- Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/07
- Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings, William M. Perry, 2002/02/21
- Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/21
- Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings, Simon Josefsson, 2002/02/22
- Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/23
- Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings, Simon Josefsson, 2002/02/23
- Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/24
- Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings, Simon Josefsson, 2002/02/24
- Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/25
- Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings, Simon Josefsson, 2002/02/25
- Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings,
Richard Stallman <=