[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Updated GNU TLS bindings
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Updated GNU TLS bindings |
Date: |
Sun, 27 Jan 2002 11:55:39 -0700 (MST) |
What do you think of gnutls.el? It contains variable definitions used
by C defuns. Maybe I should move these defvars into C? The problem
is that there are maybe a hundred more of them, from the gnutls.h
file.
If they need to be used from Lisp, defining them in Lisp is simplest.
I have also considered that they shouldn't be integer variables at
all, but rather symbols. So you would say (gnutls-init myproc
'gnutls-client) instead of (gnutls-init myproc gnutls-client).
The former is a little better because you could do error checking.
If the value is on a certain property of the symbol,
so you do (get SYMBOL 'gnutls-value) to get the numeric code,
then you can signal an error if an inappropriate symbol is used.
What is the policy regarding the Gnus manual? Is anyone editing it
for use in Emacs, or is it incorporated straight from the Gnus
distribution?
The Gnus manual is included in the Emacs distribution, and that is
its primary purpose. We should do what is best for this.
- Updated GNU TLS bindings, Simon Josefsson, 2002/01/25
- Re: Updated GNU TLS bindings, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/01/26
- Re: Updated GNU TLS bindings, Simon Josefsson, 2002/01/26
- Re: Updated GNU TLS bindings, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/01/26
- Re: Updated GNU TLS bindings, Andreas Schwab, 2002/01/26
- Re: Updated GNU TLS bindings, Simon Josefsson, 2002/01/26
- Re: Updated GNU TLS bindings, Andreas Schwab, 2002/01/26
- Re: Updated GNU TLS bindings, Simon Josefsson, 2002/01/26
- Re: Updated GNU TLS bindings, Stefan Monnier, 2002/01/28
- Re: Updated GNU TLS bindings,
Richard Stallman <=
Re: Updated GNU TLS bindings, Richard Stallman, 2002/01/26
Re: Updated GNU TLS bindings, Richard Stallman, 2002/01/26