[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Merging leim
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Merging leim |
Date: |
Sat, 22 Dec 2001 11:53:58 +0200 |
> From: address@hidden (Pavel =?iso-8859-2?q?Jan=EDk?=)
> Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 13:56:37 +0100
>
> From: "Eli Zaretskii" <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 12:22:39 +0200
>
> > I did that. The size of the standard tarball is now 27.7MB. (Btw,
> > does anyone know what is the size of the XEmacs ``sumo'' tarball?)
>
> 10469429 xemacs-21.5.3.tar.gz
> 4401838 xemacs-mule-sumo-2001-04-08.tar.gz
> 17976463 xemacs-sumo-2001-04-08.tar.gz
Is that with or without Leim? If the latter, I wonder how come they
are so much smaller (6MB) than we are. They do have ELisp manual
bundled, I believe, and Calc alone, even if it is not part of sumo,
cannot explain such a large difference.
> > Just a thought: perhaps it's a good idea to remove the *.elc files
> > from the distribution, and change the build procedure to generate
> > them. After all, we already do that for Leim.
>
> So we will force bootstrap?
You don't need a full bootstrap to byte-compile all the Lisp files.
We just need to figure out the right order of byte-compilation, and
then augment the Makefile with the necessary commands.
I'm doing the equivalent of that for quite some time, whenever I
resync with the CVS. I don't think I did "make bootstrap" more than
once or twice.
Re: Merging leim, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/21
Re: Merging leim, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/12/21
Re: Merging leim, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/12/21
- Re: Merging leim, Paul Eggert, 2001/12/21
- Re: Merging leim, Pavel Janík, 2001/12/22
- Re: Merging leim, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/23
- Re: Merging leim, Henrik Enberg, 2001/12/24
- Re: Merging leim, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/26
- Re: Merging leim, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/12/27
Re: Merging leim, Bill Wohler, 2001/12/28