[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU TLS lisp bindings
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: GNU TLS lisp bindings |
Date: |
15 Dec 2001 12:19:57 +0900 |
address@hidden (William M. Perry) writes:
> I'm not sure how this would interact with compilers that reorder
> structure members to pack them tightly or align word boundaries, etc.
> Is that legal in ANSI C?
A C compiler can insert more padding (e.g., for alignment), but that's
about it. In practice, even that is pretty predictable, and could
easily be handled by a table computed at compile time.
-Miles
--
Occam's razor split hairs so well, I bought the whole argument!
- GNU TLS lisp bindings, Simon Josefsson, 2001/12/01
- Re: GNU TLS lisp bindings, Simon Josefsson, 2001/12/07
- Re: GNU TLS lisp bindings, William M. Perry, 2001/12/12
- Re: GNU TLS lisp bindings, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/13
- Re: GNU TLS lisp bindings, Rajesh Vaidheeswarran, 2001/12/13
- Re: GNU TLS lisp bindings, Scott Lanning, 2001/12/13
- Re: GNU TLS lisp bindings, Simon Josefsson, 2001/12/13
- Re: GNU TLS lisp bindings, Scott Lanning, 2001/12/14
- Re: GNU TLS lisp bindings, William M. Perry, 2001/12/14
- Re: GNU TLS lisp bindings,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: GNU TLS lisp bindings, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/15
- Re: GNU TLS lisp bindings, Stefan Monnier, 2001/12/15
- Re: GNU TLS lisp bindings, William M. Perry, 2001/12/16
- Re: GNU TLS lisp bindings, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/17