[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1
From: |
ShengHuo ZHU |
Subject: |
Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1 |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Dec 2001 00:36:50 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.1.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) |
Daniel Ortmann <address@hidden> writes:
[...]
> Whoa! A surprise. Apparently *uuencoded* and *mime* article images
> have vastly different display times.
[...]
> B) Then I realized I used a similar article which was the almost exactly
> the same size, but NOT identical ... so I reran the test with the
> exact same article as formerly.
>
> ... The surprise is that this time it took only 9 seconds!
>
> Rerunning the test in A) gave me 19.0 seconds the second time instead
> of 27 seconds.
>
> Rerunning the first test in B) again took only 6 seconds.
>
> The difference seems to be that the slow article is uuencoded, and
> the fast one is mime.
It is because Emacs 21 has a native base64 decoder, but the uu decoder
is written in emacs-lisp. To speed it up, you can use the external
uudecode program, i.e.
(setq mm-uu-decode-function 'uudecode-decode-region-external)
[...]
>>> 4) Does your new patch, which I installed, require a change to the
>>> documentation displayed when C-k g is pressed in a gnus summary
>>> buffer, reflecting that "maybe" the article will be refetched?
>
>> Do you mean "C-u g"? Maybe the document show be changed to "force
>> re-showing".
>
> Oops, my bad.
>
> I meant to type, "require a change to the documentation displayed when
> C-h k g is pressed in a gnus summary buffer".
I'll fix that.
ShengHuo
- Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1, Daniel Ortmann, 2001/12/01
- Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1, Gerd Moellmann, 2001/12/01
- Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1, ShengHuo ZHU, 2001/12/01
- Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1, Daniel Ortmann, 2001/12/06
- Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1, ShengHuo ZHU, 2001/12/06
- Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1, Daniel Ortmann, 2001/12/07
- Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1, ShengHuo ZHU, 2001/12/10
- Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1, Daniel Ortmann, 2001/12/11
- Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1,
ShengHuo ZHU <=
- Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1, Daniel Ortmann, 2001/12/12
- Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1, ShengHuo ZHU, 2001/12/14
- Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/12/12
- Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1, Daniel Ortmann, 2001/12/12
- Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/12/13
- Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1, ShengHuo ZHU, 2001/12/14
- Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/12/15
- Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1, Daniel Ortmann, 2001/12/07