[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: table.el
From: |
Tak Ota |
Subject: |
Re: table.el |
Date: |
Sun, 02 Dec 2001 08:47:12 -0800 (PST) |
Sun, 02 Dec 2001 17:21:14 +0100: address@hidden (Kai Großjohann) wrote:
> What is a pity? All you need is (defvar foo) and then binding foo via
> let behaves like before. Is that not enough?
Now, nothing is. It was my initial reaction in haste.
-Tak
- Re: Lexical bindings (was Re: table.el), (continued)
- Re: Lexical bindings (was Re: table.el), Kim F. Storm, 2001/12/02
- Re: Lexical bindings (was Re: table.el), Miles Bader, 2001/12/02
- Re: Lexical bindings (was Re: table.el), Kim F. Storm, 2001/12/03
- Re: Lexical bindings (was Re: table.el), Miles Bader, 2001/12/03
- Re: Lexical bindings (was Re: table.el), Kim F. Storm, 2001/12/04
- Re: Lexical bindings (was Re: table.el), Miles Bader, 2001/12/03
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/12/02
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/12/02
- Re: table.el, Miles Bader, 2001/12/02
- Re: table.el, Kai Großjohann, 2001/12/02
- Re: table.el,
Tak Ota <=
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/03
Re: table.el, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2001/12/01
Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/01