[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: table.el
From: |
Tak Ota |
Subject: |
Re: table.el |
Date: |
Sat, 01 Dec 2001 01:30:18 -0800 (PST) |
01 Dec 2001 18:21:32 +0900: Miles Bader <address@hidden> wrote:
> Tak Ota <address@hidden> writes:
> > (defun kill-region-offset-by-5-wrapper ()
> > (kill-region (+ beg 5) (+ end 5)))
>
> It's bad to require that a `wrapper' know the argument names of the
> function that invokes it; better to simply pass the arguments to
> `run-wrappers' somehow, and have them passed each wrapper as ordinary
> arguments.
No, I am intentionally making the normally discouraged conduct. As
the name `kill-region-offset-by-5-wrapper' implies this wrapper
function is the extension of the kill-region. It is perfectly
legitimate the extender knowing exactly what it is extending and
knowing how the original is implemented.
Since I am trying to create an extension mechanism I am fully taking
advantage of http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/emacs-paper.html#SEC18
-Tak
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/12/01
- Re: table.el, Miles Bader, 2001/12/01
- Re: table.el,
Tak Ota <=
- Re: table.el, Miles Bader, 2001/12/01
- Re: table.el, Stefan Monnier, 2001/12/01
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/02
- Re: table.el, Stefan Monnier, 2001/12/02
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/03
- Re: table.el, Stefan Monnier, 2001/12/03
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/04
- Merging x*, w32* and mac* sources (was Re: table.el), Kim F. Storm, 2001/12/05
- Re: Merging x*, w32* and mac* sources (was Re: table.el), Eli Zaretskii, 2001/12/05
- Re: Merging x*, w32* and mac* sources (was Re: table.el), Kim F. Storm, 2001/12/05