[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: unused var gcpro1
From: |
Jason Rumney |
Subject: |
Re: unused var gcpro1 |
Date: |
27 Nov 2001 21:06:13 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1.50 |
"Stefan Monnier" <monnier+gnu/address@hidden> writes:
> I got tired of those warnings and came up with the patch below.
> It shouldn't make any difference to the code generated (even
> with -O0 I can't think of any way the compiler could generate code
> for those non-actions).
>
> But since it's a very minor issue, I'd like to know if people think
> it's safe enough. If it's not 100% safe, it's probably not worth installing.
It looks safe, and the more unnecessary warnings we quieten, the more
likely we are to spot the real warnings.
> Also, it might cause other compilers to spit out other warnings,
> since it's a really silly kind of code.
I think Microsoft's C compiler is in this category when certain
optimizations are turned on, but don't let that stop you, it is only
swapping one warning for another.
--
Jason Rumney
Re: printing.el v6.6.2, Vinicius Jose Latorre, 2001/11/28
Re: printing.el v6.6.2, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/11/28