[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: JIT stealth font-lock tuning parameters
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: JIT stealth font-lock tuning parameters |
Date: |
Sun, 18 Nov 2001 09:41:07 -0700 (MST) |
> It could return some special value which the caller could check for.
OK, so syntax-ppss should check for that value. What should it do with it ?
syntax-ppss should probably return that special value too.
The jit-lock code, which would have bound the flag to ask
parse-partial-sexp to check for input, would notice this special
value and give up.
- Re: JIT stealth font-lock tuning parameters, (continued)
- Re: JIT stealth font-lock tuning parameters, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/15
- Re: JIT stealth font-lock tuning parameters, Stefan Monnier, 2001/11/15
- Re: JIT stealth font-lock tuning parameters, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/15
- Re: JIT stealth font-lock tuning parameters, Stefan Monnier, 2001/11/15
- Re: JIT stealth font-lock tuning parameters, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/16
- Re: JIT stealth font-lock tuning parameters, Stefan Monnier, 2001/11/16
- Re: JIT stealth font-lock tuning parameters, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/11/17
- Re: JIT stealth font-lock tuning parameters, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/17
- Re: JIT stealth font-lock tuning parameters, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/17
- Re: JIT stealth font-lock tuning parameters, Stefan Monnier, 2001/11/17
- Re: JIT stealth font-lock tuning parameters,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: JIT stealth font-lock tuning parameters, Stefan Monnier, 2001/11/18
- Re: JIT stealth font-lock tuning parameters, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/19
- error - catch/throw (Re: JIT stealth font-lock tuning parameters), Karl Eichwalder, 2001/11/19