[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proposal: emulation-mode-map-alist
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Proposal: emulation-mode-map-alist |
Date: |
Wed, 07 Nov 2001 19:06:24 -0500 |
> I still think maintaining a sensible ordering of a single minor-mode-map-alist
> will be too easy to break unless every package knows every other package...
I'm not sure what you mean. The `define-minor-mode' code would
simply offer a few categories, so it can do the equivalent of what
`emulation-mode-map-alist' would do, for example.
Stefan
- Proposal: emulation-mode-map-alist, Kim F. Storm, 2001/11/06
- Re: Proposal: emulation-mode-map-alist, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/07
- Re: Proposal: emulation-mode-map-alist, Kim F. Storm, 2001/11/07
- Re: Proposal: emulation-mode-map-alist, Stefan Monnier, 2001/11/07
- Re: Proposal: emulation-mode-map-alist, Kim F. Storm, 2001/11/07
- Re: Proposal: emulation-mode-map-alist,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Proposal: emulation-mode-map-alist, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/08
- Re: Proposal: emulation-mode-map-alist, Stefan Monnier, 2001/11/08
- Re: Proposal: emulation-mode-map-alist, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/09
- Re: Proposal: emulation-mode-map-alist, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/11
- Re: Proposal: emulation-mode-map-alist, Kim F. Storm, 2001/11/11
- Re: Proposal: emulation-mode-map-alist, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/12