[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: unimportant question: CL versus Scheme
From: |
Gerd Moellmann |
Subject: |
Re: unimportant question: CL versus Scheme |
Date: |
15 May 2001 18:41:21 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.0.104 |
address@hidden (Kai Großjohann) writes:
> On 14 May 2001, Gerd Moellmann wrote:
>
> > My personal opinion is that it would be a mistake to try to replace
> > ELisp with a different language; there's just too much ELisp out
> > there which breaks even with small changes of semantics.
>
> That's right. I think the idea of the CLEmacs project by Erik
> Naggum was to provide an ELisp emulation layer which automatically
> takes effect for *.el files. And I presume that the Guile-Emacs
> project had something similar in mind.
There's nothing to say against people having visions. But, IMHO, the
vision of putting an ELisp reimplementation into a layer or to emulate
ELisp doesn't really solve anything by itself.