[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: modal proportionality, redux
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: modal proportionality, redux |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Oct 2000 10:08:50 -0400 |
> "Eric M. Ludlam" <address@hidden> writes:
> > If the greatest complaint about using other fonts is *, %, and -, why
> > not create some B&W images that mean what those characters represent,
> > like a little lock, pencil
> > look nice. This would be consistent with those other modern editors
> > I'm forced to use at work.
Don't forget the * around *info* and friends.
> [I'm not sure if the asterisk thing is a vote against or not, because
> the default mode-line face -- courier -- has the *same* problem as
> lucida, so using lucida wouldn't actually make it any worse.]
I'm actually also wondering why the default font was changed from fixed
to courier since I find courier less readable at equivalent sizes.
Stefan
- modal proportionality, redux, Miles Bader, 2000/10/17
- Re: modal proportionality, redux, Kenichi Handa, 2000/10/17
- Re: modal proportionality, redux, Miles Bader, 2000/10/17
- Re: modal proportionality, redux, Kenichi Handa, 2000/10/17
- Re: modal proportionality, redux, Eric M. Ludlam, 2000/10/17
- Re: modal proportionality, redux, Miles Bader, 2000/10/17
- Re[1]: modal proportionality, redux, Eric M. Ludlam, 2000/10/17
- Re: modal proportionality, redux,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: modal proportionality, redux, Dave Love, 2000/10/22
- Re: modal proportionality, redux, Stefan Monnier, 2000/10/23
- Re: modal proportionality, redux, Miles Bader, 2000/10/23
- Re: modal proportionality, redux, Dave Love, 2000/10/23
- Re: modal proportionality, redux, Gerd Moellmann, 2000/10/24
- Re: modal proportionality, redux, Gerd Moellmann, 2000/10/24
- Re: modal proportionality, redux, Stefan Monnier, 2000/10/17
- Re: modal proportionality, redux, Miles Bader, 2000/10/17
Re: modal proportionality, redux, Gerd Moellmann, 2000/10/17