[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bitmap files
From: |
Gerd Moellmann |
Subject: |
Re: bitmap files |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 21:36:09 +0200 (CEST) |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.0.90 |
Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:
> Dave Love <address@hidden> writes:
> > MB> it seems as if these mono images are hard-wired for given
> > MB> background (at least, that's how emacs displays them on my color
> > MB> display;
> >
> > I don't understand. They're drawn with the `1' values in the frame's
> > foreground colour for me. Isn't that right?
>
> Actually, since many of the icons are actually little pictures, I'm not
> sure this *is* right (it's the same problem as with xfaces -- they were
> mostly drawn with a black-on-white display in mind, so on a
> white-on-black display, whether they look `correct' has a lot to do with
> the image content: a picture often looks better when it's drawn with a
> constant set of colors (usually black-on-white) whereas a `graphic'
> often looks better when drawn using the current fg/bg colors.
>
> But the toolbar background is "grey" on mono displays, which is dithered...
> It seems like in this case the icons will all have solid backgrounds,
> which will look bad...
I just tried with a mono server, and the toolbar image backgrounds are
stippled as they should be (using a grey stipple is the way grey is
simulated on mono displays). If this fails for you, could be please
tell me details?
- Re: bitmap files, (continued)
- Re: bitmap files, Miles Bader, 2000/10/12
- Re: Re[1]: bitmap files, Dave Love, 2000/10/12
- Re[1]: bitmap files, Eric M. Ludlam, 2000/10/12
- Re: Re[1]: bitmap files, Dave Love, 2000/10/13
- Re[1]: bitmap files, Eric M. Ludlam, 2000/10/13
- Re: Re[1]: bitmap files, Dave Love, 2000/10/13
- Re: Re[1]: bitmap files, Gerd Moellmann, 2000/10/16
- Re: Re[1]: bitmap files, Gerd Moellmann, 2000/10/13
Re: bitmap files, Dave Love, 2000/10/12