emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#77113: closed ([PATCH] Use default print settings in nnfeed--write-s


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#77113: closed ([PATCH] Use default print settings in nnfeed--write-server)
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2025 10:38:02 +0000

Your message dated Sat, 05 Apr 2025 13:36:52 +0300
with message-id <86ldsex5bv.fsf@gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#77113: [PATCH] Use default print settings in 
nnfeed--write-server
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #77113,
regarding [PATCH] Use default print settings in nnfeed--write-server
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
77113: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=77113
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH] Use default print settings in nnfeed--write-server Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 15:49:06 +0530 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
I suppose it'd be possible to construct an adversarial example that
would cause the current code to fail, but this should be
uncontroversial. I've had occassional problems that it seems to fix.

Ref:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnus-english/2025-03/msg00020.html

Attachment: 0001-lisp-gnus-nnfeed-el--nnfeed--write-server.patch
Description: [PATCH] * lisp/gnus/nnfeed.el (nnfeed--write-server):

--

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#77113: [PATCH] Use default print settings in nnfeed--write-server Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2025 13:36:52 +0300
> From: Daniel Semyonov <daniel@dsemy.com>
> Cc: James Thomas <jimjoe@gmx.net>,  77113@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2025 12:00:57 +0300
> 
> >>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes:
> 
>     >> Cc: daniel@dsemy.com
>     >> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 15:49:06 +0530
>     >> From:  James Thomas via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
>     >> the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
>     >> 
>     >> I suppose it'd be possible to construct an adversarial example that
>     >> would cause the current code to fail, but this should be
>     >> uncontroversial. I've had occassional problems that it seems to fix.
>     >> 
>     >> Ref:
>     >> 
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnus-english/2025-03/msg00020.html
> 
>     > Daniel, any comments?
> 
> Yes, this should be applied.
> Sorry I thought I already replied to this, but I replied on the Gnus
> mailing list.

Thanks, done, and closing the bug.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]