--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
openjdk@9/10 sources not reproducible |
Date: |
Thu, 9 Mar 2023 10:48:53 +0100 |
Hi,
it looks like the (auto-generated) tarballs for openjdk@9 and openjdk@10
changed their hash, causing a hash mismatch via
guix build -S openjdk@9 --no-substitutes --no-grafts
I’m not sure why it uses these tarballs in the first place, since we
have a hg-download.
Lars
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
Re: bug#62071: openjdk@9/10 sources not reproducible |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Mar 2023 10:12:12 +0100 |
On Sun, 12 Mar 2023 22:00:21 +0100
Björn Höfling <bjoern.hoefling@bjoernhoefling.de> wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Mar 2023 10:48:53 +0100
> Lars-Dominik Braun <lars@6xq.net> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > it looks like the (auto-generated) tarballs for openjdk@9 and
> > openjdk@10 changed their hash, causing a hash mismatch via
> >
> > guix build -S openjdk@9 --no-substitutes --no-grafts
> >
> > I’m not sure why it uses these tarballs in the first place, since we
> > have a hg-download.
Changed to hg-download in commit(s):
7636c49b45adb9870cf416c64bde032ec858a820
Thanks for pointing this out.
Björn
pgpg6XW_zCpNC.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---