[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#61410: closed (texmathp and literal $)

From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#61410: closed (texmathp and literal $)
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 21:43:02 +0000

Your message dated Mon, 13 Feb 2023 22:42:07 +0100
with message-id <86cz6dw8cw.fsf@gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#61410: texmathp and literal $
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #61410,
regarding texmathp and literal $
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact

61410: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=61410
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: texmathp and literal $ Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 21:16:22 +0100 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Hi all,

please consider this small example:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---


text \verb|$|


%%% Local Variables:
%%% mode: latex
%%% TeX-master: t
%%% End:
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Now do:

  M-: (goto-char 58) RET
  C-c C-f C-t

and AUCTeX insert \mathtt{} at point.  Doing 'M-x texmathp RET' returns:

  math-mode is on: $ begins at buffer position 55

texmathp ignores the verb macro completely.  The similar scenario can be
created for a verbatim-like environment.  Can others reproduce this?
And if yes, any idea about course of action?

Best, Arash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#61410: texmathp and literal $ Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 22:42:07 +0100 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Ikumi Keita <ikumi@ikumi.que.jp> writes:

> This looks good to me. It takes care of all possible difficulties I
> worried. :-)

What, maximum score? ;-) I installed the change incl. a test with commit
de6aa05d7 and closing this report.  Many thanks for your comments.

Best, Arash

--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]