emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#61070: closed (gnu: packages: Add guile-simple-iterators.)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#61070: closed (gnu: packages: Add guile-simple-iterators.)
Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2023 06:21:02 +0000

Your message dated Sun, 05 Feb 2023 07:20:43 +0100
with message-id <fb0b7281592d794aa187742c45456d4dfe6a6902.camel@gmail.com>
and subject line Re: gnu: packages: Add guile-simple-iterators.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #61070,
regarding gnu: packages: Add guile-simple-iterators.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
61070: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=61070
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: gnu: packages: Add guile-simple-iterators. Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 03:16:15 +0000
Hello,

guile-simple-iterators is a collection of macros to provide iteration inspired by Racket in Guile. I use them and find them delightful, so I thought other Guix users would appreciate ready access to them.

Thanks,
Juli

Attachment: 0001-gnu-packages-Add-guile-simple-iterators.patch
Description: Text Data


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: gnu: packages: Add guile-simple-iterators. Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2023 07:20:43 +0100 User-agent: Evolution 3.46.0
Am Samstag, dem 28.01.2023 um 19:26 +0100 schrieb Liliana Marie
Prikler:
> Am Samstag, dem 28.01.2023 um 17:58 +0000 schrieb J. Sims:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Saturday, January 28th, 2023 at 00:32, Liliana Marie Prikler
> > <liliana.prikler@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > I'll wait for the CI results and schedule this towards pushing it
> > > on February 5th (with adjustments for the above points).
> > 
> > Just to clarify, do I need to make the adjustments or are you
> > making them before pushing? Either way is fine; the wording is just
> > ambiguous.
> They're small changes I can do as a reviewer ;)
> 
> > > It's better to dedent this a little so that url can fit on a
> > > line.
> > 
> > I'm not sure I understand what you mean. Dedent the hash? And how
> > so?
> No, dedent the entire origin.
Aaaand it's pushed.

Thanks


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]