bug#59397: closed ([PATCH] feature/tree-sitter: Utilize new font-lock faces for more tree-sitter backed modes)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2022 17:49:51 -0800
with message-id <4EAF68CB-CE82-47A6-B0F1-8A3C7D2236F4@gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#59397: [PATCH] feature/tree-sitter: Utilize new 
font-lock  faces for more tree-sitter backed modes
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #59397,
regarding [PATCH] feature/tree-sitter: Utilize new font-lock faces for more 
tree-sitter backed modes
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
59397: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=59397
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems

--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH] feature/tree-sitter: Utilize new font-lock faces for more tree-sitter backed modes Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2022 03:42:19 +0000

X-Debbugs-CC: casouri@gmail.com, theo@thornhill.no

This patch adds support for using the new font-lock faces for more tree-sitter backed modes.

js.el:

- For the number feature, is there a better way to match for exactly NaN or Infinity?

- It might be a good idea to make a parent/base mode (ECMA?) like done in c-ts-mode for JS and TS, since there's a bit of overlap. I'm not volunteering though, since I don't use JS or TS ;).

0001-Utilize-new-font-lock-faces-for-more-tree-sitter-bac.patch
Description: Text Data

--- End Message ---

> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#59397: [PATCH] feature/tree-sitter: Utilize new font-lock  faces for more tree-sitter backed modes
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Tue, 22 Nov 2022 17:49:51 -0800
>
>
>
>
> Randy Taylor <dev@rjt.dev> writes:
>
> > On Monday, November 21st, 2022 at 22:38, Randy Taylor <dev@rjt.dev> wrote:
> >> 
> >> On Monday, November 21st, 2022 at 16:49, Yuan Fu casouri@gmail.com wrote:
> >> 
> >> > Thanks! I was busy with other things, but I’ll try to merge this soon!
> >> > 
> >> > Yuan
> >> 
> >> 
> >> No worries, take your time.
> >> 
> >> It's probably best to merge Theo's first (Bug#59445) since it's smaller, 
> >> after which I will rebase and post a new patch.
> >> 
> >
> > OK, latest and greatest patch attached.
>
> Thanks! I merged it.
>
> Yuan
>
>
> --- End Message ---