bug#58383: closed (29.0.50; Make it easier to invert vc-prepare-patches-separately)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 16 Nov 2022 07:50:21 +0000
with message-id <87edu38hj6.fsf@posteo.net>
and subject line Re: bug#58383: 29.0.50; Make it easier to invert 
vc-prepare-patches-separately
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #58383,
regarding 29.0.50; Make it easier to invert vc-prepare-patches-separately
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
58383: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=58383
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> 29.0.50; Make it easier to invert vc-prepare-patches-separately
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sat, 08 Oct 2022 10:49:29 -0700
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> How about a prefix argument to vc-prepare-patch to invert one's usual
> setting for vc-prepare-patches-separately?  Most people who contribute
> to more than one project regularly will want to use both.
>
> On the other hand, having a numeric prefix argument mean "send patches
> correspoding to the top N revisions of the current branch" would be very
> convenient.  Perhaps these two could be combined by using a negative
> number to mean also invert?
>
> -- 
> Sean Whitton
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#58383: 29.0.50; Make it easier to invert vc-prepare-patches-separately
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Wed, 16 Nov 2022 07:50:21 +0000
>
>
>
>
> Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> writes:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Just based on reviewing the docstrings, lgtm.  Thank you for your
> > interest in my idea.
>
> Great, I'll close the issue then.  The patch will be pushed along with
> some package-vc related changes in the next new days.
>
>
> --- End Message ---