bug#59236: closed (29.0.50; [PATCH] bytecomp.el: (byte-recompile-directory): Fix negated ignore)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2022 07:22:36 +0000
with message-id <87edu7wc77.fsf@posteo.net>
and subject line Re: bug#59236: 29.0.50; [PATCH] bytecomp.el: 
(byte-recompile-directory): Fix negated ignore
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #59236,
regarding 29.0.50; [PATCH] bytecomp.el: (byte-recompile-directory): Fix negated 
ignore
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
59236: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=59236
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems

--- Begin Message --- Subject: 29.0.50; [PATCH] bytecomp.el: (byte-recompile-directory): Fix negated ignore Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2022 04:26:45 +0000

Hi,

The patch 8638aace3f try to use the variable
`byte-compile-ignore-files`, but the logic is inverse for both file
and directory parts;
and the patch a01024c859 fix the logic for file part;
this patch try to fix the logic for directory part.

Please help review and apply it. Thanks.

Best regards
Lin

0001-bytecomp.el-byte-recompile-directory-Fix-negated-ign.patch
Description: Text Data

--- End Message ---

> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#59236: 29.0.50; [PATCH] bytecomp.el: (byte-recompile-directory): Fix negated ignore
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sun, 13 Nov 2022 07:22:36 +0000
>
>
>
>
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
> > merge 59236 59139
> > thanks
> >
> >> Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2022 04:26:45 +0000
> >> From:  lin Sun via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
> >>  the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
> >> 
> >> The patch 8638aace3f try to use the variable
> >> `byte-compile-ignore-files`, but the logic is inverse for both file
> >> and directory parts;
> >> and the patch a01024c859 fix the logic for file part;
> >> this patch try to fix the logic for directory part.
> >> 
> >> Please help review and apply it. Thanks.
> >
> > This is a duplicate of bug#59139.
> >
> > Philip, can you please take care of this?
>
> I had applied the patch that was identical to the one proposed here, but
> it appears my message confirming that wasn't sent out.  I'll update both
> bug reports.
>
>
> --- End Message ---