emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#57884: closed ([PATCH] Flymake backend using the shellcheck program)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#57884: closed ([PATCH] Flymake backend using the shellcheck program)
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2022 22:57:02 +0000

Your message dated Fri, 04 Nov 2022 22:56:50 +0000
with message-id <87mt96jpl9.fsf@posteo.net>
and subject line Re: bug#57884: [PATCH] Flymake backend using the shellcheck 
program
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #57884,
regarding [PATCH] Flymake backend using the shellcheck program
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
57884: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=57884
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH] Flymake backend using the shellcheck program Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2022 18:48:19 +0200 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux)
Tags: patch

See https://www.shellcheck.net/ for details on the ShellCheck program.
It seems to be the most usual linter for shell scripts.

Attachment: 0001-New-Flymake-backend-using-the-shellcheck-program.patch
Description: Text Data


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#57884: [PATCH] Flymake backend using the shellcheck program Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2022 22:56:50 +0000
Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net> writes:

> Augusto Stoffel <arstoffel@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On Sun, 18 Sep 2022 at 21:18, Philip Kaludercic wrote:
>>
>>> I just tried it out and it behaves the way you advertised it.
>>
>> Could someone merge this patch then, so it gets some testing before
>> Emacs 29 is cut?
>
> As I assume that everything has been settled, I've pushed the patch.

Looks like I forgot to close the report after pushing the patch, so I am
doing it now.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]