emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#57363: closed ([PATCH 0/1] Set #o640 permissions for log file of she


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#57363: closed ([PATCH 0/1] Set #o640 permissions for log file of shepherd service in container.)
Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2022 11:21:02 +0000

Your message dated Fri, 02 Sep 2022 16:50:43 +0530
with message-id <87czceuino.fsf@systemreboot.net>
and subject line Re: [PATCH v2] shepherd: Set #o640 permissions for log file of 
service in container.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #57363,
regarding [PATCH 0/1] Set #o640 permissions for log file of shepherd service in 
container.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
57363: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=57363
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH 0/1] Set #o640 permissions for log file of shepherd service in container. Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 23:01:02 +0530
When a shepherd service is run using make-forkexec-constructor, the log file
has #o640 permissions. This is set in the shepherd source code.
=> 
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/shepherd.git/tree/modules/shepherd/service.scm?h=v0.9.1#n987

However, when a shepherd service is run using
make-forkexec-constructor/container, the log file has #o644 permissions. This
patch corrects that.

CCing Ludo since they wrote the code adjacent to this patch.

Thanks!

Arun Isaac (1):
  shepherd: Set #o640 permissions for log file of service in container.

 gnu/build/shepherd.scm | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

-- 
2.37.1




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] shepherd: Set #o640 permissions for log file of service in container. Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2022 16:50:43 +0530
>> * gnu/build/shepherd.scm (make-forkexec-constructor/container): Set #o640
>> permissions for log file.
>
> LGTM!

Thanks, pushed!

> However, note that ‘make-forkexec-constructor/container’ is now
> deprecated in favor of (guix least-authority); apparently PageKite and
> Jami are the only real users left.

Ah, I didn't know. I've been making extensive use of
make-forkexec-constructor/container in guix-forge and all my
services. Time to switch!


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]