bug#55026: closed (potential prebuilt binaries in the Mono package)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 01 Sep 2022 19:10:52 -0400
with message-id <871qsu8zcz.fsf_-_@gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#55026: potential prebuilt binaries in the Mono package
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #55026,
regarding potential prebuilt binaries in the Mono package
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
55026: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=55026
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> potential prebuilt binaries in the Mono package
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Tue, 19 Apr 2022 15:19:32 -0300 (BRT)
>
>
>
>
> It seems the package for Mono in Guix uses a tarball that contains a lot of 
> prebuilt DLLs. This doesn’t seem to have been mentioned when the package was 
> introduced. Could it have been a mistake? Some related discussion: 
> <https://github.com/mono/mono/issues/7445> and also 
> <https://logs.guix.gnu.org/guix/2022-04-19.log#195614>
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#55026: potential prebuilt binaries in the Mono package
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 01 Sep 2022 19:10:52 -0400
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> Mono was removed from Guix with commit
> bd638a8ad6140db87851a86faae89e736e148f3d.
>
> Closing.
>
> Maxim
>
> "Zhu Zihao"
> <all_but_last@163.com> writes:
>
> > Agree.
> >
> >
> > Actually, there's more prebuilt binaries in Mono 6 (current version)
> >
> >
> > And it's impossible to remove these binaries (see 
> > https://github.com/dotnet/source-build/issues/1930)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > At 2022-08-13 04:03:43, "Maxim Cournoyer" <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>zamfofex <zamfofex@twdb.moe> writes:
> >>
> >>> It seems the package for Mono in Guix uses a tarball that contains a
> >>> lot of prebuilt DLLs. This doesn’t seem to have been mentioned when
> >>> the package was introduced. Could it have been a mistake? Some related
> >>> discussion: <https://github.com/mono/mono/issues/7445> and also
> >>> <https://logs.guix.gnu.org/guix/2022-04-19.log#195614>
> >>
> >>If nobody volunteers to do the work necessary to get our mono package to
> >>build without prebuilt binaries in the next 2 weeks, I suggest we remove
> >>it from our collection.  Only a handful package depend on it, most of
> >>them optionally it seems, and the mono we carry is severely outdated
> >>(2016).
> >>
> >>What do you think?
> >>
> >>Maxim
>
>
> --- End Message ---