--- Begin Message ---
|
Subject: |
cygwin surrogate-pair test now fails (since grep-2.22, and no one noticed) |
|
Date: |
Sun, 2 Jul 2017 08:57:00 -0700 |
On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 12:11 AM, <arnold@skeeve.com> wrote:
> Jim Meyering <jim@meyering.net> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 12:55 AM, <arnold@skeeve.com> wrote:
>> > Jim Meyering <jim@meyering.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >> > Do you still want the log? If so I'll send it...
>> >>
>> >> Yes, please, in case it's easy to fix.
>> >
>> > Attached. Thanks!
>>
>> Thanks.
>> I've determined the cause, at least. The sole caller of mbstoupper
>> (which contained the relevant __CYGWIN__-specific
>> surrogate-pair-handling code) was removed by the improvements of
>> v2.21-63-g8a33cde, and not long after, I noticed that mbstoupper was
>> no longer used, so removed it altogether.
>>
>> Since this affects surrogate-pairs only on cygwin, I'm not going to do
>> anything about this prior to release. After release, I'll make that
>> test skip or maybe even remove it altogether.
>
> OK, glad the log was helpful. In the future I will try to remember to
> send it along if I see failures.
>
> Do you want to document this cygwin issue as a known issue somewhere? :-)
Sure. I've adjusted the subject and added bug-grep@ so we get an
auto-assigned issue number in the tracker.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 1/1] tests: make surrogate-pair pass under Cygwin |
|
Date: |
Tue, 23 Nov 2021 18:34:51 -0800 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.0 |
I installed the attached fancier patch instead; please give it a try.
I'm boldly marking the bug as fixed; we can unmark it later if I'm wrong.
0001-tests-skip-surrogate-search-test-on-Cygwin.patch
Description: Text Data
--- End Message ---