bug#51428: closed (core-updates-frozen-batched-changes built and ready to merge)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 12 Nov 2021 00:29:54 -0500
with message-id <87k0heq6ul.fsf@gmail.com>
and subject line Re: [bug#51428] core-updates-frozen-batched-changes built and 
ready to merge
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #51428,
regarding core-updates-frozen-batched-changes built and ready to merge
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
51428: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=51428
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> core-updates-frozen-batched-changes built and ready to merge
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Wed, 27 Oct 2021 00:04:01 -0400
>
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I've experimented quite a bit with core-updates-frozen-batched-changes
> in the last weeks, and it seems to be in a decent shape, good enough to
> merge into core-updates-frozen, I think.
>
> I'd like to bring attention to some non-trivial changes that I included
> in the branch:
>
> 1. merging of the staging branch -- quite a few conflicts had to be
> resolved.
>
> 2. Replacement of inkscape@0.92 by inkscape@1.1, which required solving
> some dependency cycles.
>
> 3. Fix for https://issues.guix.gnu.org/50957 via a new search path
> specification on gdk-pixbuf and accompanying build phase and profile
> hook.
>
> I'll send the corresponding patches for review, which can also be
> consulted directly on the core-updates-frozen-batched-changes branch,
> which I've manually built on Berlin for things such as Rust and
> ungoogled-chromium.
>
> I'd like to merge it into core-updates-frozen by the beginning of
> November, unless there are problems you can spot :-).
>
> Thank you,
>
> Maxim
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: [bug#51428] core-updates-frozen-batched-changes built and ready to merge
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Fri, 12 Nov 2021 00:29:54 -0500
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> Hi Thiago,
>
> Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauermann@kolabnow.com> writes:
>
> > Hello Maxim,
> >
> > Em sexta-feira, 5 de novembro de 2021, às 02:06:04 -03, Maxim Cournoyer 
> > escreveu:
> >> It's curious that it would occur though, because I thought that when
> >> gdk-pixbuf was found with `manifest-lookup-package', it meant it'd also
> >> be part of the manifest inputs?  Apparently it isn't the case.  Weird!
> >
> > I’m glad you found out what the problem was. I didn’t know where to start 
> > investigating it!
> >
> >> Thanks for the report!
> >
> > Thank you for looking into it. Should I open a bug report about it?
>
> No, the commit 20e3dd052d7e4f59273e3646d3533d43c87c30b0 contains a
> workaround guarding against such situation.
>
> Thanks :-).
>
>
> --- End Message ---