--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
file-system: validate flags |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Oct 2021 00:24:28 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/78.15.0 |
Imagine the following file system definition in your config.scm:
```
(file-system
(device (uuid "UUID-123"))
(flags '((create-mount-point? #t)))
(mount-point "/mnt")
(type "ext4")))
```
When you reconfigure there will be no complain, but when you reboot your
system wont boot. The parameter to flags is nonsense, it should be
something like: `read-only`. So mounting of the file system will fail...
It would be nice if we can have some flag validation during reconfigure.
~Jonathan
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
Re: bug#51425: file-system: validate flags |
Date: |
Sun, 07 Nov 2021 23:16:17 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hi,
Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> skribis:
> Jonathan Brielmaier <jonathan.brielmaier@web.de> skribis:
>
>> Imagine the following file system definition in your config.scm:
>>
>> ```
>> (file-system
>> (device (uuid "UUID-123"))
>> (flags '((create-mount-point? #t)))
>> (mount-point "/mnt")
>> (type "ext4")))
>> ```
>>
>> When you reconfigure there will be no complain, but when you reboot your
>> system wont boot.
>
> I suppose it fails to boot because of a match error in
> ‘mount-flags->bit-mask’, right?
>
>> The parameter to flags is nonsense, it should be something like:
>> `read-only`. So mounting of the file system will fail...
>
> That’s a good use case for the recently-added ‘sanitize’ record field
> property.
Done in 5eb5c0789f34e87ee417a53ddfcfa3b6521bb337.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
--- End Message ---