bug#41790: closed ([PATCH] Update emacs-direnv)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 06 Aug 2021 00:49:52 -0400
with message-id <87sfznjhxr.fsf_-_@gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#41790: [PATCH] Update emacs-direnv
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #41790,
regarding [PATCH] Update emacs-direnv
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
41790: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=41790
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems

--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH] Update emacs-direnv Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 10:12:03 -0500

10:11 kate says: guix refresh -l emacs-direnv
No dependents other than itself: emacs-direnv@2.0.0

0001-gnu-emacs-direnv-Update-to-2.1.0.patch
Description: Text Data

--- End Message ---

> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#41790: [PATCH] Update emacs-direnv
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Fri, 06 Aug 2021 00:49:52 -0400
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> Katherine Cox-Buday <cox.katherine.e@gmail.com> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> >      (build-system emacs-build-system)
> > +    (arguments
> > +     `(#:phases
> > +       (modify-phases %standard-phases
> > +         (add-after 'unpack 'patch-in-direnv
> > +           (lambda* (#:key inputs #:allow-other-keys)
> > +             (let* ((direnv-path (assoc-ref inputs "direnv"))
> > +                    (direnv-bin (string-append
> > +                                 "\"" direnv-path "/bin/direnv\"")))
> > +               (substitute* "direnv.el"
> > +                 (("\"direnv\"") direnv-bin))))))))
> > +    (inputs
> > +     `(("direnv" ,direnv)))
> >      (propagated-inputs
> >       `(("dash" ,emacs-dash)
> >         ("with-editor" ,emacs-with-editor)))
>
> Thanks to Nicolas and Oleg for the thoughtful review.  They had good
> comments about was propagation was not the best way to make the package
> usable out of the box.  Now that the above does the same but in a
> functional way, I think it is a good addition.
>
> I applied the above hunk (the package had already been updated) as
> commit 0d72f24ac084acf9d69e147a692e5d8bcb2ea21b.
>
> Thank you!
>
> Closing.
>
> Maxim
>
>
> --- End Message ---