emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#48729: closed (Bitmask VPN)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#48729: closed (Bitmask VPN)
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2021 14:34:02 +0000

Your message dated Wed, 7 Jul 2021 10:33:28 -0400
with message-id <1d6c073f-3253-9e5c-5e25-af4accaf3580@raghavgururajan.name>
and subject line Re: [PATCHES v9 ALL/25]: Bitmask
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #48729,
regarding Bitmask VPN
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
48729: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=48729
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Bitmask VPN Date: Sat, 29 May 2021 06:57:19 -0400
Hello Guix!

I am opening this thread for patch-series for packaging Bitmask VPN and its dependencies.

Jorge (jgart) and I, are working on this.

Regards,
RG.

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: [PATCHES v9 ALL/25]: Bitmask Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2021 10:33:28 -0400
Hi Tobias!

I spent an embarrasingly long time trying to get this to work under Sway (I'm sure it works fine under a GNOME VM, that's not the point :-p) but had to give up.  It's not a blocker.

Sorry to hear that. I appreciate the help with the testing.

Documentation should teach something new, for example:

  “This service type makes the @uref{https://bitmask.net, Bitmask}  VPN
   client available to all users as a system package, and installs   the
   global system Polkit permission rules currently required for   users
   to run it.

   It will @emph{not} start a Polkit agent for you, as most   desktop
   environments provide their own.  Users who don't use such a   desktop
   environment must run their own agent in order to use Bitmask.”

Made the change. :)

+   (default-value bitmask)

That's OK if there's no way this service will need to be extended in future, which IIRC was the case, since eventually it should even be removed.

Yep, that's the plan.

Regards,
RG.

P.S:

Pushed as a329bc7e0c..02562e2f1e. Closing.

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]