[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#46366: closed ([PATCH] gnu: Update zfs.)
From: |
GNU bug Tracking System |
Subject: |
bug#46366: closed ([PATCH] gnu: Update zfs.) |
Date: |
Mon, 08 Feb 2021 02:53:02 +0000 |
Your message dated Mon, 8 Feb 2021 03:51:56 +0100
with message-id <20210208035156.5ebd959a@scratchpost.org>
and subject line Re: [bug#46366] [PATCH] gnu: Update zfs.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #46366,
regarding [PATCH] gnu: Update zfs.
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)
--
46366: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=46366
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
[PATCH] gnu: Update zfs. |
Date: |
Sun, 07 Feb 2021 15:18:34 +0000 |
I am fairly unmotivated to continue working on ZFS-on-Guix, but anyway. Here's
an update of ZFS to 2.0.2, at least.
Tested only with `./pre-inst-env guix build zfs` on a patched Guix. Fairly
unmotivated to do more testing since there is no real interest in getting my
patches merged. Posting here just in case somebody actually gets interested.
I have ZFS and Guix on a fileserver I'm using in a homelab for my homework.
It's working for now. Not really interested in pushing for better ZFS support
anymore since I'm tired and need to get on with my homework.
>From 566c4aa9104b5866d15c53340d9b68e0960c49bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: raid5atemyhomework <raid5atemyhomework@protonmail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2021 22:47:30 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Update zfs.
* gnu/packages/file-systems.scm (zfs): Update to 2.0.2.
---
gnu/packages/file-systems.scm | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/file-systems.scm b/gnu/packages/file-systems.scm
index e6ee645be0..caf190d8ba 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/file-systems.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/file-systems.scm
@@ -847,7 +847,7 @@ APFS.")
(define-public zfs
(package
(name "zfs")
- (version "2.0.1")
+ (version "2.0.2")
(outputs '("out" "module" "src"))
(source
(origin
@@ -856,7 +856,7 @@ APFS.")
"/download/zfs-" version
"/zfs-" version ".tar.gz"))
(sha256
- (base32 "0y3992l4nzr67q18lz1kizw0za1shvqbpmsjz9shv4frh5ihllbi"))))
+ (base32 "090b2pp0cgzkjcnbjf8ms28dah5dff8s04q31z62czapwiy0drdx"))))
(build-system linux-module-build-system)
(arguments
`(;; The ZFS kernel module should not be downloaded since the license
--
2.30.0
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
Re: [bug#46366] [PATCH] gnu: Update zfs. |
Date: |
Mon, 8 Feb 2021 03:51:56 +0100 |
Hi raid5atemyhomework,
On Sun, 07 Feb 2021 15:18:34 +0000
raid5atemyhomework via Guix-patches via <guix-patches@gnu.org> wrote:
> I am fairly unmotivated to continue working on ZFS-on-Guix, but anyway.
> Here's an update of ZFS to 2.0.2, at least.
>
> Tested only with `./pre-inst-env guix build zfs` on a patched Guix. Fairly
> unmotivated to do more testing since there is no real interest in getting my
> patches merged. Posting here just in case somebody actually gets interested.
>
> I have ZFS and Guix on a fileserver I'm using in a homelab for my homework.
> It's working for now. Not really interested in pushing for better ZFS
> support anymore since I'm tired and need to get on with my homework.
I totally understand.
It's frustrating when well-tested complete patches get unanswered for several
weeks--it happened to me before.
In any case, I've asked whether someone who knows how to create a profile
in a service can finally review your patches.
I'm sorry.
Pushed the update of the zfs package to 2.0.2 to guix master as
commit 5424ca6d6e01672bf7304a4144b05a98852adbab.
pgpB9shrvYzSw.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- bug#46366: closed ([PATCH] gnu: Update zfs.),
GNU bug Tracking System <=