emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#46366: closed ([PATCH] gnu: Update zfs.)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#46366: closed ([PATCH] gnu: Update zfs.)
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2021 02:53:02 +0000

Your message dated Mon, 8 Feb 2021 03:51:56 +0100
with message-id <20210208035156.5ebd959a@scratchpost.org>
and subject line Re: [bug#46366] [PATCH] gnu: Update zfs.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #46366,
regarding [PATCH] gnu: Update zfs.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
46366: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=46366
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Update zfs. Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2021 15:18:34 +0000
I am fairly unmotivated to continue working on ZFS-on-Guix, but anyway.  Here's 
an update of ZFS to 2.0.2, at least.

Tested only with `./pre-inst-env guix build zfs` on a patched Guix.  Fairly 
unmotivated to do more testing since there is no real interest in getting my 
patches merged.  Posting here just in case somebody actually gets interested.

I have ZFS and Guix on a fileserver I'm using in a homelab for my homework.  
It's working for now.  Not really interested in pushing for better ZFS support 
anymore since I'm tired and need to get on with my homework.


>From 566c4aa9104b5866d15c53340d9b68e0960c49bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: raid5atemyhomework <raid5atemyhomework@protonmail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2021 22:47:30 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Update zfs.

* gnu/packages/file-systems.scm (zfs): Update to 2.0.2.
---
 gnu/packages/file-systems.scm | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/file-systems.scm b/gnu/packages/file-systems.scm
index e6ee645be0..caf190d8ba 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/file-systems.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/file-systems.scm
@@ -847,7 +847,7 @@ APFS.")
 (define-public zfs
   (package
     (name "zfs")
-    (version "2.0.1")
+    (version "2.0.2")
     (outputs '("out" "module" "src"))
     (source
       (origin
@@ -856,7 +856,7 @@ APFS.")
                               "/download/zfs-" version
                               "/zfs-" version ".tar.gz"))
           (sha256
-           (base32 "0y3992l4nzr67q18lz1kizw0za1shvqbpmsjz9shv4frh5ihllbi"))))
+           (base32 "090b2pp0cgzkjcnbjf8ms28dah5dff8s04q31z62czapwiy0drdx"))))
     (build-system linux-module-build-system)
     (arguments
      `(;; The ZFS kernel module should not be downloaded since the license
--
2.30.0




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: [bug#46366] [PATCH] gnu: Update zfs. Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 03:51:56 +0100
Hi raid5atemyhomework,

On Sun, 07 Feb 2021 15:18:34 +0000
raid5atemyhomework via Guix-patches via <guix-patches@gnu.org> wrote:

> I am fairly unmotivated to continue working on ZFS-on-Guix, but anyway.  
> Here's an update of ZFS to 2.0.2, at least.
> 
> Tested only with `./pre-inst-env guix build zfs` on a patched Guix.  Fairly 
> unmotivated to do more testing since there is no real interest in getting my 
> patches merged.  Posting here just in case somebody actually gets interested.
> 
> I have ZFS and Guix on a fileserver I'm using in a homelab for my homework.  
> It's working for now.  Not really interested in pushing for better ZFS 
> support anymore since I'm tired and need to get on with my homework.

I totally understand.

It's frustrating when well-tested complete patches get unanswered for several
weeks--it happened to me before.

In any case, I've asked whether someone who knows how to create a profile
in a service can finally review your patches.

I'm sorry.

Pushed the update of the zfs package to 2.0.2 to guix master as
commit 5424ca6d6e01672bf7304a4144b05a98852adbab.

Attachment: pgpB9shrvYzSw.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]