emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#46053: closed ([PATCH 0/2] Add Ren'py build system)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#46053: closed ([PATCH 0/2] Add Ren'py build system)
Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2021 14:30:03 +0000

Your message dated Sun, 07 Feb 2021 15:29:09 +0100
with message-id 
<2e82cd8cb0882ac3fde3b52b9ae897bb27ed32ba.camel@student.tugraz.at>
and subject line Re: [bug#46053] [PATCH 0/2] Add Ren'py build system
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #46053,
regarding [PATCH 0/2] Add Ren'py build system
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
46053: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=46053
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH 0/2] Add Ren'py build system Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2021 14:40:18 +0100 User-agent: Evolution 3.34.2
Hi Guix,

a proper Ren'py build system had been on my TODO list ever since I've
packaged it back in 2019, but I've so far been too lazy to actually
create one.  While I'm happy to announce, that this is no longer the
case, there are still a number of things, that can be improved in our
Ren'py package and build system.

This series contains two patches.  The first adds the build system, the
second a package example for "The Question".  Since "The Question" is
already an output of Ren'py, I don't see much value in this patch other
than for explanatory purposes, so I don't think I'll commit that one. 
Instead, I'll probably redefine Ren'py once the first patch is merged.
I'm building this series on top of #45736, so things might be a bit
different on master, but I hope it works out regardless.

Regards,
Leo




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: [bug#46053] [PATCH 0/2] Add Ren'py build system Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2021 15:29:09 +0100 User-agent: Evolution 3.34.2
Hello,

Am Sonntag, den 24.01.2021, 09:49 +0100 schrieb Nicolas Goaziou:
> LGTM, in addition to #45736.
I've now pushed both this (well, v2 of it) and #45736.

> It should also be documented in the manual.
Documentation is present in v2, which I've pushed.  I hope it's
sufficient.

Regards,
Leo.



--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]