|
From: | GNU bug Tracking System |
Subject: | bug#45909: closed (rust@1.47.0, rust-1.48.0 and rust-1.49.0 broken) |
Date: | Sat, 16 Jan 2021 20:27:02 +0000 |
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jan 2021 21:26:44 +0100 with message-id <87im7w6323.fsf@nckx> and subject line Re: bug#45909: rust@1.47.0, rust-1.48.0 and rust-1.49.0 broken has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #45909, regarding rust@1.47.0, rust-1.48.0 and rust-1.49.0 broken to be marked as done. (If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact help-debbugs@gnu.org.) -- 45909: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=45909 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Subject: rust@1.47.0, rust-1.48.0 and rust-1.49.0 broken Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 23:50:13 +0000 User-agent: mu4e 1.4.14; emacs 27.1 The recent llvm 11.0.0 -> 11.0.1 change seems to have broken rust on the master branch.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Subject: Re: bug#45909: rust@1.47.0, rust-1.48.0 and rust-1.49.0 broken Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2021 21:26:44 +0100 Leo Famulari 写道:If anyone is wondering why we didn't notice failures of packages that depend on rust, the canonical 'rust' packages is rust-1.45, but thesefailures seem to only affect later versions of rust.Thanks. I am reverting the update on master for now. Kind regards, T G-Rsignature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |