--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
[PATCH 0/1] Add 'patch-headers' lint checker |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Nov 2020 13:00:17 +0100 |
Hi!
There’s the unwritten (?) guideline that patches should start with a
short comment indicating what they do, where they come from, and what
their upstream status is.
The ‘patch-headers’ checker that this patch adds check for the
presence of a comment at the start of each referenced patch. It
currently reports 59 issues.
WDYT?
Ludo’.
Ludovic Courtès (1):
lint: Add 'patch-headers' checker.
guix/lint.scm | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
tests/lint.scm | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 111 insertions(+)
--
2.29.2
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
Re: [bug#44591] [PATCH 0/1] Add 'patch-headers' lint checker |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Nov 2020 12:42:03 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) |
Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> skribis:
> There’s the unwritten (?) guideline that patches should start with a
> short comment indicating what they do, where they come from, and what
> their upstream status is.
>
> The ‘patch-headers’ checker that this patch adds check for the
> presence of a comment at the start of each referenced patch. It
> currently reports 59 issues.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Ludo’.
>
> Ludovic Courtès (1):
> lint: Add 'patch-headers' checker.
Pushed as 4f156c259f984f4f5a3692364746446294ee102c.
Ludo’.
--- End Message ---