emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#43151: closed (Calibre ebook-viewer requires QtWebEngine)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#43151: closed (Calibre ebook-viewer requires QtWebEngine)
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2020 20:13:02 +0000

Your message dated Tue, 8 Sep 2020 22:11:44 +0200
with message-id <20200908201144.GA25269@jurong>
and subject line Re: bug#43151: Resolve Calibre run-time dependency
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #43151,
regarding Calibre ebook-viewer requires QtWebEngine
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
43151: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=43151
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Calibre ebook-viewer requires QtWebEngine Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 11:48:17 +0200
Hello,

when trying to view an epub using ebook-viewer from the calibre package
(or by directly clicking on an epub in calibre), the program fails with
the message:
   Could not find QtWebEngineProcess

I see that commit d79ec4fd343bc2a72652aa3a4b4ae14bd8df88ac has added
python2-pyqtwebengine and qtwebengine to the calibre inputs, but this
is apparently not enough.

I did not git bisect to see where the problem first appeared, but could
do so if this would help debugging.

Andreas




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#43151: Resolve Calibre run-time dependency Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 22:11:44 +0200
Hello,

On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 06:15:15PM +1000, Brendan Tildesley wrote:
> Your patch also works I think but it will wrap the programs twice, so
> you will get calibre, .calibre-real, and ..calibre-real-real, etc for
> every program, which seems ugly. My patch reproduces the same PYTHONPATH
> that is set in python-build-system in addition to wrapping PYTHONPATH
> (unless I made a mistake), although at the cost of code duplication. I
> leave it to you and who ever is reviewing this to decide which way is
> more correct and push one, haha.

thanks to both of your for your patches! I just pushed Brendan's, which
wraps only once at the price of copy-pasting from another package. I confirm
that it works, also to click on an epub file from within calibre. Closing
the two bugs asking about qtwebengine.

Concerning the update, is mathjax a required input now, or could we just
leave it out and update nevertheless?

Andreas



--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]