bug#38594: closed (Deprecate ghc-stylish-haskell in favor of stylish-haskell)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 21 Mar 2020 21:30:43 +0100
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: [bug#38594] Deprecate ghc-stylish-haskell in favor of 
stylish-haskell
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #38594,
regarding Deprecate ghc-stylish-haskell in favor of stylish-haskell
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden.)


-- 
38594: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=38594
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems

--- Begin Message --- Subject: Deprecate ghc-stylish-haskell in favor of stylish-haskell Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 14:39:33 +0000

Hi all,

As far as I can tell ghc-stylish-haskell and stylish-haskell are the same package.

I chose to keep stylish-haskell in favor of ghc-stylish-haskell just because it was newer.

- John

0001-gnu-stylish-haskell-Update-description.patch
Description: Text Data

0002-gnu-ghc-stylish-haskell-Deprecate-older-duplicate-pa.patch
Description: Text Data

--- End Message ---

--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: [bug#38594] Deprecate ghc-stylish-haskell in favor of stylish-haskell Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 21:30:43 +0100 User-agent: Notmuch/0.29.3 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/26.3 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)

John Soo <address@hidden> writes:

> Hi all,
>
> As far as I can tell ghc-stylish-haskell and stylish-haskell are the same
> package.
>
> I chose to keep stylish-haskell in favor of ghc-stylish-haskell just
> because it was newer.

Applied both patches, thanks!

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

--- End Message ---