[debbugs-tracker] bug#37613: closed ([PATCH 0/1] gnu: Add python-httpie.)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 18 Oct 2019 18:09:52 +0300
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: [bug#37613] [PATCH] gnu: Add python-httpie.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #37613,
regarding [PATCH 0/1] gnu: Add python-httpie.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden.)


-- 
37613: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=37613
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> [PATCH 0/1] gnu: Add python-httpie.
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Fri, 4 Oct 2019 08:55:20 +0200
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> NeoMutt/20180716
>
>
>
>
> Make the commands `http` available.
>
> Warning: The tests attempt to access external web servers,
> so we cannot run them.
>
> -- 
> Tanguy
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---

--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: [bug#37613] [PATCH] gnu: Add python-httpie. Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 18:09:52 +0300 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux)

Tanguy Le Carrour <address@hidden> writes:

> Hi Oleg!
>
>
> Le 10/17, Oleg Pykhalov a écrit :
>> What do you think about naming the package “httpie” instead, because
>> it's intended to run by calling ‘httpie’ command as in ‘youtube-dl’
>> package?  I could change the name if you don't mind and push it.
>
> I have no opinion on this! I package cookiecutter as
> `python-cookiecutter`, so I did the same with httpie.
> The only problem is that the binary is actually called `http`.

Well, ‘http’ as a package name is not good IMO ;-)

httpie as named in Debian and Nix should be good enough.

Pushed to master.

> Should I consider doing the same for the package `python-poetry` I've 
> submitted?!

Yes, just a ‘poetry’.

Thanks,
Oleg.

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

--- End Message ---