--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
[PATCH 0/4] Move Haskell packages to “haskell-xyz” |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Aug 2019 00:16:08 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Guix,
This is Robert’s patch that moves all of the Haskell libraries and
applications out of “haskell.scm” and leaves only Haskell compilers. I
factored it out into four commits to make it a little easier to follow.
It’s all pretty straight forward package moving, and it has already been
examined by Robert and myself. Nevertheless, I want to confirm that we
are all still on board with the move to “haskell-xyz” and that the
commits are clear enough. (I’m pretty confident, so if no one pipes up
I’ll push it in a few days.)
Here’s the summary:
Robert Vollmert (4):
gnu: Move application packages out of haskell.scm.
gnu: cabal-doctest: Move to haskell-check.scm.
gnu: Move non-compilers out of haskell.scm.
gnu: Move Haskell SDL 2 packages to haskell-xyz.scm.
gnu/packages/agda.scm | 2 +-
gnu/packages/bioconductor.scm | 2 +-
gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm | 2 +-
gnu/packages/cran.scm | 2 +-
gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm | 2 +-
gnu/packages/games.scm | 1 +
gnu/packages/graphics.scm | 2 +-
gnu/packages/haskell-apps.scm | 246 +-
gnu/packages/haskell-check.scm | 27 +-
gnu/packages/haskell-xyz.scm | 11459 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
gnu/packages/haskell.scm | 11292 +----------------------------
gnu/packages/idris.scm | 2 +-
gnu/packages/statistics.scm | 2 +-
gnu/packages/wm.scm | 2 +-
14 files changed, 11535 insertions(+), 11508 deletions(-)
--
2.22.1
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
Re: [bug#37227] [PATCH 0/4] Move Haskell packages to “haskell-xyz” |
Date: |
Sat, 31 Aug 2019 10:34:24 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hi again,
Timothy Sample <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi Guix,
>
> This is Robert’s patch that moves all of the Haskell libraries and
> applications out of “haskell.scm” and leaves only Haskell compilers. I
> factored it out into four commits to make it a little easier to follow.
>
> It’s all pretty straight forward package moving, and it has already been
> examined by Robert and myself. Nevertheless, I want to confirm that we
> are all still on board with the move to “haskell-xyz” and that the
> commits are clear enough. (I’m pretty confident, so if no one pipes up
> I’ll push it in a few days.)
After a few days, I’m still pretty confident, so I pushed these
commits. :)
-- Tim
--- End Message ---