[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#36339: closed (generated .pc files leaks build-tim

From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#36339: closed (generated .pc files leaks build-time LDFLAGS)
Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2019 13:10:02 +0000

Your message dated Sun, 07 Jul 2019 15:09:29 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#36339: generated .pc files leaks build-time LDFLAGS
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #36339,
regarding generated .pc files leaks build-time LDFLAGS
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact

36339: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=36339
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: generated .pc files leaks build-time LDFLAGS Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2019 11:19:52 +0200 User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.1

According to the pkgconfig generated files, Libs.private contains the build-time LDFLAGS (-Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed).

These flags are private to the way I built guile, and should not affect packages using guile later.

I have observed this behavior in guile-2.0, 2.2.5 and 2.9.2.

Name: GNU Guile
Description: GNU's Ubiquitous Intelligent Language for Extension
Version: 2.0.14
Libs: -L${libdir} -lguile-2.0 -lgc
Libs.private:  -lgmp -lltdl -L/usr/lib64/../lib64 -lffi \
  -lunistring -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed  -lcrypt  -lm             \

Cflags: -I${pkgincludedir}/2.0 -pthread

Gentoo Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/590904
The (1) part seems resolved somehow.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#36339: generated .pc files leaks build-time LDFLAGS Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2019 15:09:29 +0200 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux)
Hi Cyprien,

Cyprien Nicolas <address@hidden> skribis:

> On 24/06/2019 15:17, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> I believe the attached patch should fix it.  Could you confirm?
> Yes it does, tested on 2.2.6 and 2.9.2. All arch-dependent binaries have
> been built with the right LDFLAGS, and the pkgconfig file looks clean.

Awesome.  Pushed as a69b567d97f7c9193924c775e1dd86e43a35b8bd to the
‘stable-2.2’ branch.



--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]