emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#31676: closed (27.0.50; More helpful error message


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#31676: closed (27.0.50; More helpful error message for unescaped character literals)
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 17:23:01 +0000

Your message dated Fri, 19 Apr 2019 19:22:03 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#31676: 27.0.50; More helpful error message for 
unescaped character literals
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #31676,
regarding 27.0.50; More helpful error message for unescaped character literals
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
31676: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=31676
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: 27.0.50; More helpful error message for unescaped character literals Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2018 12:18:30 +0200
A reddit user noted these messages popping up when starting Emacs

Loading ‘~/.emacs.d/init’: unescaped character literals `?[', `?]' detected!

and wondered what to do about it.  Perhaps it would be a good idea to
just say something like

unescaped character literals `?[', `?]' detected, `?\[', `?\]' expected

or something along those lines?  For Emacs 26.2.



In GNU Emacs 27.0.50 (build 20, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.22.11)
 of 2018-05-19 built on stories
Repository revision: f4d9fd3dd45f767eca33fbf1beee40da790fa74e
Windowing system distributor 'The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11902000
System Description: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch)


-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#31676: 27.0.50; More helpful error message for unescaped character literals Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 19:22:03 +0200
Am Sa., 9. Juni 2018 um 19:12 Uhr schrieb Philipp Stephani
<address@hidden>:
>
>
>
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> schrieb am Fr., 8. Juni 2018 um 16:51 Uhr:
>>
>> > Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2018 12:00:26 +0200
>> > Cc: address@hidden
>> >
>> > Sounds reasonable, here's a patch.
>> >
>> > From 4bd8348753980be95dc4bcba47e52f7f79255fb6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> > From: Philipp Stephani <address@hidden>
>> > Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2018 11:59:02 +0200
>> > Subject: [PATCH] Make warning about unescaped character literals more 
>> > helpful.
>> >
>> > See Bug#31676.
>> >
>> > * src/lread.c (Flread_unescaped_character_literals_warning): New
>> > defun.
>> > (load_warn_unescaped_character_literals): Use it.
>> > (syms_of_lread): Define new defun.  Unintern internal
>> > variable, which is not used any more outside of lread.c
>> >
>> > * lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el (byte-compile-from-buffer): Use new
>> > defun.
>> >
>> > * test/src/lread-tests.el (lread-tests--unescaped-char-literals):
>> > test/lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp-tests.el
>> > (bytecomp-tests--unescaped-char-literals): Adapt unit tests.
>>
>> Sounds okay, but can you tell why you implemented
>> lread--unescaped-character-literals in C?  If that's because you need
>> to call it from load_warn_unescaped_character_literals, then C
>> functions can call Lisp functions with no problems, we have several
>> examples of that in the sources.  AFAICT, the C implementation is just
>> a "transliteration" of straightforward Lisp code, so it reads strange.
>
>
> The function uses an uninterned variable, so it has to be in C. I think 
> that's slightly better than interning the variable and having some Lisp 
> function access it (the latter would have one additional internal symbol).

However, your point about the C function being strange is valid. I've
reimplemented it in Lisp now and pushed commit 0b4b380ce4 to master.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]