emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#35185: closed ([PATCH] gnu: mu: Update to 1.2.)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#35185: closed ([PATCH] gnu: mu: Update to 1.2.)
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2019 10:45:01 +0000

Your message dated Mon, 08 Apr 2019 12:44:20 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: [bug#35185] [PATCH] gnu: mu: Update to 1.2.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #35185,
regarding [PATCH] gnu: mu: Update to 1.2.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
35185: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=35185
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH] gnu: mu: Update to 1.2. Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2019 22:25:18 +0100 User-agent: mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 26.1
Hello Guix!

Here's an update for mu!

I've noticed we've moved away from using Github's generated tarballs and
using git-fetch instead. However, it looks like the tarball for mu is
provided by the developer so we should be fine.

Is that right?  See "Assets" from https://github.com/djcb/mu/releases/tag/1.2 .

Thanks,
Pierre

Attachment: 0001-gnu-mu-Update-to-1.2.patch
Description: Text Data


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: [bug#35185] [PATCH] gnu: mu: Update to 1.2. Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2019 12:44:20 +0200
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
I've added the ‘.0’ to VERSION instead, and will push this tomorrow
after some testing.

Done as 857fabcd0b29a41c4a1263686254de648cfefc59.

Kind regards,

T G-R

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]