[debbugs-tracker] bug#25904: closed (Formatting bug with js-mode)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 13 Feb 2019 03:27:26 +0300
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#25904: Patches
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #25904,
regarding Formatting bug with js-mode
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
25904: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=25904
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems

--- Begin Message --- Subject: Formatting bug with js-mode Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 17:50:19 -0500

Hi there. Apologies if this is the wrong place to submit a bug on js-mode for emacs. I am an emacs newbie (in fact, I've only used spacemacs and still relatively new there too) and not sure where to post about this.

Basically I am trying to find the right place to report this issue, which was determined to be an upstream issue with js-mode:

https://github.com/felipeochoa/rjsx-mode/issues/34

In essence, a fat arrow _expression_ followed by a linefeed, followed by an _expression_ (such as a JSX tag with children) that is not wrapped in parenthesis is valid syntax and recognized by editors like WebStorm and VSCode but doesn't work correctly in this editor.

If this is not the right place I would be grateful for directions on where this bug belongs.

Thanks!

--- End Message ---

> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#25904: Patches
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Wed, 13 Feb 2019 03:27:26 +0300
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:65.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/65.0
>
>
>
>
> Version: 27.1
>
> On 11.02.2019 01:03, Jackson Ray Hamilton wrote:
>
> > Both changes are attached.  They could be applied to the emacs-26 
> > branch.  (Or master, but emacs-26 would be preferable so we can deliver 
> > it sooner.  I tested on both branches.)
>
> Pushed to master, thank you.
>
> Regarding emacs-26, please feel free to lobby it with Eli. I think it's 
> a fine patch, but I'm not sure it's important enough regression-wise.
>
>
> --- End Message ---