--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
[PATCH] utils: Fix wrap-program filename generation. |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Jul 2018 07:01:03 +0530 |
* guix/build/utils.scm (wrap-program): While generating a new filename for the
wrapped program, trim dots from the left of the basename. This prevents
already wrapped files being wrapped again with two or more dots prepended to
them.
---
guix/build/utils.scm | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/guix/build/utils.scm b/guix/build/utils.scm
index c58a1afd1..0794c658f 100644
--- a/guix/build/utils.scm
+++ b/guix/build/utils.scm
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
;;; Copyright © 2013 Andreas Enge <address@hidden>
;;; Copyright © 2013 Nikita Karetnikov <address@hidden>
;;; Copyright © 2015, 2018 Mark H Weaver <address@hidden>
+;;; Copyright © 2018 Arun Isaac <address@hidden>
;;;
;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
;;;
@@ -1032,7 +1033,8 @@ modules in $GUILE_LOAD_PATH, etc.
If PROG has previously been wrapped by 'wrap-program', the wrapper is extended
with definitions for VARS."
(define wrapped-file
- (string-append (dirname prog) "/." (basename prog) "-real"))
+ (string-append
+ (dirname prog) "/." (string-trim (basename prog) #\.) "-real"))
(define already-wrapped?
(file-exists? wrapped-file))
--
2.15.1
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
Re: [bug#32102] [PATCH v2 2/2] gnu: gajim: Combine wrap-program phases. |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Nov 2018 16:13:51 +0530 |
I pushed "PATCH 1: Do not double wrap executables" to core-updates-next
after making the changes you suggested.
I pushed "PATCH 2: Rename wrap-program phases" to master since it
only causes a rebuild of gajim.
"PATCH 3: Return #t from wrap-gsettings-schema-dir phase" is now
irrelevant due to commit 60c5b4448961ce1745b7f0bfada1e7620f238ea0 by
Clement on master.
--- End Message ---