|
From: | GNU bug Tracking System |
Subject: | [debbugs-tracker] bug#30375: closed (just a boring documentation license violation) |
Date: | Wed, 07 Feb 2018 00:03:01 +0000 |
Your message dated Tue, 6 Feb 2018 17:02:09 -0700 with message-id <address@hidden> and subject line Re: bug#30375: just a boring documentation license violation has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #30375, regarding just a boring documentation license violation to be marked as done. (If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact address@hidden) -- 30375: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=30375 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message ---Subject: just a boring documentation license violation Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 16:24:25 -0700 Hello,I have a very boring thing to report: there is a site posting the documentation for sed without including the license.No need to reply, just passing the information along since you might know who to tell it to.Best,Nathan
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Subject: Re: bug#30375: just a boring documentation license violation Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 17:02:09 -0700 Hello,On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 4:24 PM, Nathan Schuetz <address@hidden> wrote:I have a very boring thing to report: there is a site posting the
documentation for sed without including the license.
https://www.computerhope.com/unix/used.htm Thank you for reporting this issue.I will forward it to the licensing people at FSF.strangely,they updated/generated the page very recently, but used quite an old version of the manual.They also claim copyright to material published on their website, and that is clearly not valid for sed's manual.As this is not a bug, I'm marking this as done, but discussion can continue by replying to this thread.regards,- assaf
--- End Message ---
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |