--- Begin Message ---
|
Subject: |
[PATCH] r-foreign: Update hash and remove duplicate recipe. |
|
Date: |
Tue, 01 Aug 2017 15:58:59 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.2.1 |
0001-r-foreign-Update-hash-and-remove-duplicate-recipe.patch
Description: Text Data
Dear Guix,
It seems we have two (almost identical) package recipes for r-foreign.
This patch removes one of them.
Also, the upstream tarball seems to have changed, so I updated the
SHA256 hash.
If someone has the old tarball, we could look at what exactly has
changed.
Kind regards,
Roel Janssen
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
|
Subject: |
Re: [bug#27906] [PATCH] r-foreign: Update hash and remove duplicate recipe. |
|
Date: |
Wed, 02 Aug 2017 00:49:24 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.1.1 |
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Roel Janssen <address@hidden> skribis:
>
>> Efraim Flashner writes:
>>
>>> I have /gnu/store/l1xl1hya1q2vdr059i00s0q9rpwb846a-foreign_0.8-67.tar.gz
>>> if that would help
>>
>> Now this is odd:
>> $ wget
>> http://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/Archive/foreign/foreign_0.8-67.tar.gz
>
> The other one is at:
>
>
> https://mirror.hydra.gnu.org/file/foreign_0.8-67.tar.gz/sha256/1mcrm2pydimbyjhkrw5h380bifj1jhwzifph1xgh90asf3lvd1xd
>
> The contents are identical per “diff -r --no-dereference”. However
> metadata differs:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> address@hidden /tmp$ tar tvf t.tgz |head
> drwxr-xr-x hornik/users 0 2016-09-13 13:04 foreign/
> drwxr-xr-x hornik/users 0 2014-03-28 10:08 foreign/po/
> -rw-r--r-- hornik/users 5913 2012-10-04 12:33 foreign/po/R-fr.po
> -rw-r--r-- hornik/users 27343 2014-03-28 10:08 foreign/po/de.po
> -rw-r--r-- hornik/users 49598 2014-03-28 10:08 foreign/po/pl.po
> -rw-r--r-- hornik/users 5203 2012-10-11 18:41 foreign/po/R-de.po
> -rw-r--r-- hornik/users 28708 2014-03-28 10:08 foreign/po/fr.po
> -rw-r--r-- hornik/users 17250 2014-03-28 10:08 foreign/po/foreign.pot
> -rw-r--r-- hornik/users 2853 2014-03-28 10:08 foreign/po/R-foreign.pot
> -rw-r--r-- hornik/users 10262 2014-03-28 10:08 foreign/po/R-pl.po
> address@hidden /tmp$ tar tvf foreign_0.8-67.tar.gz |head
> drwxr-xr-x ligges/users 0 2016-09-13 13:04 foreign/
> drwxr-xr-x ligges/users 0 2014-03-28 10:08 foreign/po/
> -rw-r--r-- ligges/users 5913 2012-10-04 12:33 foreign/po/R-fr.po
> -rw-r--r-- ligges/users 27343 2014-03-28 10:08 foreign/po/de.po
> -rw-r--r-- ligges/users 49598 2014-03-28 10:08 foreign/po/pl.po
> -rw-r--r-- ligges/users 5203 2012-10-11 18:41 foreign/po/R-de.po
> -rw-r--r-- ligges/users 28708 2014-03-28 10:08 foreign/po/fr.po
> -rw-r--r-- ligges/users 17250 2014-03-28 10:08 foreign/po/foreign.pot
> -rw-r--r-- ligges/users 2853 2014-03-28 10:08 foreign/po/R-foreign.pot
> -rw-r--r-- ligges/users 10262 2014-03-28 10:08 foreign/po/R-pl.po
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> In short, it’s safe to update the hash.
>
> Ludo’.
Thanks for explaining the differences. I pushed the hash change as a
separate commit from the removal of the duplicate recipe.
Kind regards,
Roel Janssen
--- End Message ---